tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1827293309574913027.post4433634136271132299..comments2023-03-30T00:52:50.594-07:00Comments on Sword and Circle: Keep Out/Come InMaijahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18264657619197571965noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1827293309574913027.post-54375207489480797652016-03-14T06:34:59.836-07:002016-03-14T06:34:59.836-07:00Agreed :-)Agreed :-)Maijahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18264657619197571965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1827293309574913027.post-62048200857311519162016-03-14T00:57:20.103-07:002016-03-14T00:57:20.103-07:00I've tried explain the relation between distan...I've tried explain the relation between distance and guard position before and ran into the following conversation: <br /><br />"It is obviously to your advantage to give your opponent the least lead time to assess your guard. And so, your guard position must firm up the closer you are, but out of distance, you are free to move your blade freely to establish whatever psychological frame you want. The closer you get to the last possible moment before making any defensive action, the more effective it would be." <br />"lol why would you wait until the enemy is moving into your city to build walls" <br />"That is obviously well past the last possible moment. The better analogy is to say that if your opponent's advance scouts have determined that you have no defenses, but you can construct a solid defense before the main opposing force arrives, you are much better off." <br /><br />Exaggerated, but not much. I've long opposed the concept of a lone, best guard position. but also have opposed the idea of random movement. You have an opportunity to give the opponent information? The best is to give them deliberate misinformation, rather than random information or no information or why would you ever give them actual information. considerphlebashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10181761769189564293noreply@blogger.com